Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted vee

To: Donald Chester <k4kyv@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted vee
From: Edward McCann via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Edward McCann <edwmccann@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 11:38:57 -0800
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Don: can you elaborate a bit.

Ladder line from shack to remote tuner at base of tower then what feed to 
antenna?
More ladder line? What kind of remote balanced tuner?

Thanks,

AG6CX

Sent from my iPhone

> On Nov 6, 2015, at 8:06 AM, Donald Chester <k4kyv@hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> Hello,
> 
>> I have an inverted vee up about 100 feet. It resonates at 3615. From past 
>> experience, how much should I add to each leg to get it down to 3515?
> 
>> Thanks,
> 
>> Carol
> 
> Hams are WAY too obsessed with SWR.  If it's a full size half wave, the 
> difference between an antenna resonant at 3615 and 3515 wouldn't make a bit 
> of difference in performance.
> VSWR at 2:1 or less is perfectly OK.  Even 3:1 will have negligible effect on 
> the signal if it doesn't trigger a fold-back feature in the radio.
> 
> I use open wire tuned feeders on mine, and get equally excellent results all 
> the way from 3500-4000, but I use a remotely tuned matching network at the 
> base of the tower. If I wanted to use coax, I would purchase some hard-line 
> (ever cable TV stuff works fine), cut the antenna to be resonant at 3750, and 
> just use it and not worry about it.
> 
> 
> Don k4kyv
>                         
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>