Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Identifying Teflon Cable

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Identifying Teflon Cable
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:19:27 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On Fri,9/11/2015 3:17 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist wrote:


On 9/11/2015 1:24 PM, Jim Brown wrote:

Which is a terrible choke, because the Q of #61 material is far too high.


73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________


There is a tradeoff regarding power handling.  61 material will have
far less heating than, for example, 43, or 31.  Depending on what
you are trying to do, 61 might make sense.  I use it in my
50 ohm to 450 ohm bal-bal transformer.

You're talking about a TRANSFORMER to handle RF power, where higher Q is desirable. My comment was on use of the core for a choke.

Important fundamental principle: Chokes want LOW Q material, lots of resistance, transformers want HIGH Q if they need to handle power. #61 high Q below 10 MHz, low Q at UHF, so it is a good choke material at UHF, a good transformer material below 30 MHz. This is true of nearly all ferrite materials -- materials have low loss at lower frequencies, so can handle power, much more loss at higher frequencies, so can't handle power but are good as chokes. A key difference between materials is WHERE they transition from low loss to high loss.

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>