Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Guy Wire Cable Clamps

To: "towertalk@contesting.com" <towertalk@contesting.com>, Donald Chester <k4kyv@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Guy Wire Cable Clamps
From: "J. Hunt via TowerTalk" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Reply-to: "J. Hunt" <ki5dq@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2015 13:24:28 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Interesting statement from Rohn:  Rohn "no longer supports" .

I have seen tower failures of sharply bent guy cables about a anchor point, and 
many other tower failures when people "cut corners" upon installation.
Decades ago - I was taught an old proverb "Never put a saddle on a dead horse".

I only use Big Grips, a bit more costly... but never have seen one fail.

Thanks N 73,
James
ki5dq

--------------------------------------------
On Sun, 6/7/15, Donald Chester <k4kyv@hotmail.com> wrote:

 Subject: [TowerTalk] Guy Wire Cable Clamps
 To: "towertalk@contesting.com" <towertalk@contesting.com>
 Date: Sunday, June 7, 2015, 2:56 PM
 
 
 It's tower and antenna season once again.
 
 For tower guying I prefer Big Grips, but for some applications I still use old 
fashioned cable clamps, for example, to attach guy wires to ground anchors, 
allowing for easy re-adjustment as necessary, months or even years after the 
initial installation.  Another is for strain insultors and other hardware whose 
contour won't allow it to fit snugly against the U-shaped bend of the Big Grip. 
An engineer at PLP verified that this has caused failure,
 particularly with offshore manufactured strain insulators. He strongly 
recommended against using Big Grips for such applications, knowingly 
discouraging potential sales.
 
 For a recent project I ordered a bag of 3/16" clamps from Rohn through one of 
their distributors, under the same part number as listed in the Rohn catalogue. 
Originally, these were part # 3/16 CCM, but the Rohn catalogue now lists them 
as 3/16 CCF.  The old style were "malleable", while the
 new style are said to be "forged".  I have found the newer style to be all but 
worthless.  One would be better off buying cheap wire rope clips from Ace 
Hardware.
 
 The older CCM clamps had a deep channel in the body of the saddle, which 
positioned the dead end to overlay the live cable under pressure from the 
U-bolt, so that all compression was exerted between the two sections of cable. 
Instead of a real channel, the newer CCF clamps have four bumps on the body of 
the saddle, laid out in a rectangular configuration. The channel formed between 
the bumps is too shallow to hold both segments of cable in place so that one 
rides on top of the other; the dead end tends to ride over to one side at about 
a 45 degree angle, wedging partly against the body of the saddle instead of 
pressing 100% against the live cable. In addition, the older clamps had a 
series of diagonal grooves at the bottom of the channel, designed to grip the 
cable over the full length of the channel.  The newer ones have a single 
diagonal ridge, which pinches the live cable in exactly the same manner as the 
U-bolt does when clamps are installed the
 wrong way and the U-bolt b  ears down on the live cable. I did a test run with 
some newer clamps, a piece of scrap cable and a come-along. I was able to pull 
the cable tightly enough to cause it to slip through three clamps with the nuts 
firmly tightened. I suspect this would have been impossible with the older 
clamps; some piece of hardware would fail or the cable would break before it 
would slip through the clamps.
 
 Furthermore, the U-bolts that come with these clamps are no better than the 
saddles.  The older ones were heavily galvanised, like marine hardware. The 
newer ones are merely zinc-plated, just like the aforementioned Ace Hardware 
product. About six months ago I used some of the newer
 clamps for a less critical application, to attach some pieces of guy cable 
anchoring the end insulators of a wire antenna. Now, in little more than half a 
year, the U-bolt nuts are completely rusted with no remaining sign of zinc 
plating at all; in fact the nuts on these clamps are already rustier than the 
older ones on a nearby tower that has been up for more than 30 years.
 
 I called this to the attention of a Rohn engineer, and his only comment was 
that Rohn "no longer supports"  the use of cable clamps with guy wires; they 
now solely recommend Big Grips. He said they only list clamps in the catalogue 
because they still occasionally get orders for them. The illustration in the 
catalogue clearly shows a picture of the older style clamps, not the junk they 
sell now.
 
 Does anyone know of a vendor who stocks original style heavily galvanised 
clamps similar or identical to the older 3/16CCM? Based on what I paid in 1980 
and on-line inflation calculators, these should now run a little over $1.00 
apiece.
 
 Don k4kyv
     
         
           
   
 _______________________________________________
 
 
 
 _______________________________________________
 TowerTalk mailing list
 TowerTalk@contesting.com
 http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
 
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>