Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: antenna choices for K4XS

To: "'Jeff AC0C'" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: antenna choices for K4XS
From: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 18:59:28 +0200
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Where is that supporting study?

I doubt that they measured within the main lobe of the antennas on the
comparison test. 

73
Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: TowerTalk [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jeff
AC0C
Sent: Montag, 13. April 2015 18:15
To: bcarling@cfl.rr.com; towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: antenna choices for K4XS

Read the supporting study - the details of the test method are explained 
pretty clearly.  Then you can make your determination as to the validity of 
the methods employeed.

73/jeff/ac0c
www.ac0c.com
alpha-charlie-zero-charlie

-----Original Message----- 
From: Bry Carling AF4K
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 11:12 AM
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: antenna choices for K4XS

Very good point. I do not know whether these deep scientific studies were 
done at NEAR
FIELD to the antennas or at distances of hundreds of miles away.

The articles / books claim that these yagoi beams have virtually no gain at 
all. I wonder
whhow NEC would stack up against their measurements? It's in a boob, or 
article so it MUST
be true. I am just left pondering the same as you - trying to decide where 
ALL that extra
power is disappearing to...

On 13 Apr 2015 at 7:40, Markku Oksanen wrote:

> On "Low Performance Trap Antennas" :  Is it really known what is the cause

> for the apparently very large difference between a correctly designed trap

> beam, say a TH6DXX or similar and one of the not so good performers?  Trap

> loss can't be a big part because even relatively low power loss at a given

> trap, say 50 W, will burn the thing very quickly.  Assume 3 elements, 6 
> traps that get exposed on a given band and -3dB gain compared to better 
> beam, this would be some 1500/2/6 watts, a lot of watts per trap.  Even it

> not this much just loss, there would be ample power to melt the insides of

> the trap.
> MarkkuOH2RA/WW1C
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk 

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>