To: | "tower" <towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna choices |
From: | "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com> |
Date: | Tue, 7 Apr 2015 09:18:07 -0500 |
List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
At the very bottom of the page for Original Tennadynne products is this statement: " *These gain figures are fictitious, but since other antenna manufacturers tend to use them to manipulate things in their favor by enhancing their specifications with phony data, we've added them so that you can get accurate comparisons. " 73 K9WN Jake ...actually I find that M2 is right on in their numbers – no specmanship here whatsoever. Also Optibeam and Innovantennas all use actual numbers from real modeling! I asked the owner of Tennadyne to provide actual modeled numbers – his reply was to send an anecdotal note from a user glowing about how well it performed – to which I replied “you can find this type of report for TA33’s... real hard data from modeling is what I need to know for comparison”... he declined to provide it and wished me well. Nice enough guy – but no hard data to back it up. Gary K9RX _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] antenna choices, Chris |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna choices, Paul Christensen |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna choices, Kelly Taylor |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna choices, Paul Christensen |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |