Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] 80 mts four square or yagi?

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 80 mts four square or yagi?
From: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 21:13:06 +0100
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
It works well. I use that a idea as a reflector to my elevated GP on 160m
with one elevated radials as a counterpoise. 
Still passiv but will become a phased array with two of those bent elements.
It out hears my relatively short beverage (160m) on the same direction.

73
Peter


-----Original Message-----
From: TowerTalk [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
john@kk9a.com
Sent: Mittwoch, 11. März 2015 20:29
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 80 mts four square or yagi?

You can use a single tower to support four bent wire verticals.  K9RS
describes this here-> 
http://www.kkn.net/dayton2008/multi-element%20lowband%20verticals%206.pdf

I have modeled it and the pattern looks good.

John KK9A - WP2AA


To:     Towertalk Reflector <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject:        [TowerTalk] 80 mts four square or yagi?
From:   Jorge Diez CX6VM <cx6vm.jorge@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 8 Mar 2015 14:06:11 -0300


Wish someone have some analysis or field test to compare a 4SQ with sixty
1/4
WL radials each vertical and a 3 element wire yagi with boom at 115ft

Which one have more GAIN?

Thanks
Jorge
CX6VM/CW5W

Enviado desde mi iPhone
______________________________

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>