Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley Antenna Question

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley Antenna Question
From: "Mike Ryan" <mryan001@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:16:23 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Norm, You could be spot here....some of the newer low loss cables were probably not around when some of these antennas came to market, so the suggestion was for RG-8 or 213. But I would suspect that as long as the cable is 50/52 ohm it should be fine. And it would not pay to cut anything for an exact frequency based on the velocity factor, because as soon as you change bands all that work goes out the window. I think the plan for this guy is to use DX Engineering's LMR400 clone after my pigtail from the antenna and rotor loop. Whatever he provides is what I will install at this point. Thanks for the response. - Mike

-----Original Message----- From: Cox, Norman R.
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 1:02 PM
To: Mike Ryan ; towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: RE: [TowerTalk] Mosley Antenna Question

I can't exactly remember, but I think the main difference in RG-213 and RG-8 is that one has definite MIL standards and the other (RG-8 I think) had more-or-less standards, but varied by manufacturer. I imagine that, at the time the antennas were introduced, 213 and 8 were the two most used by amateurs, the antennas were evaluated with those, and so that's what they recommended. I would suspect that newer, low-loss cables would work ok, but you might find the characteristics changed slightly (due to the lower loss).

Norm
KE0ZT


________________________________________
From: TowerTalk [towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] on behalf of Mike Ryan [mryan001@tampabay.rr.com]
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 11:54 PM
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: [TowerTalk] Mosley Antenna Question

Over the years I have heard stories of unexplained failures with Mosley antennas which were equally unexplained as having to do with the selection of certain coax cables. One recent incident was with a local here that had trouble getting a PRO 67 to ‘cooperate’ only with the use of RG 213 cable. Recalling this story, I have been asked to assist with the install of a Mosley TA-53, 5 band beam on a 14ft boom. NOTHING in the manual (which is dated) suggests this but an on-line review of the TA-63 and a peek at a manual found on-line also seem to suggest that the ‘recommended coax is RG213”. Any comments on the validity and reason for the use of JUST RG-213 and not some other 50/52 ohm cable? Thanks.... - Mike
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
=
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>