Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Work Platform

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Work Platform
From: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 13:29:27 -0800
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 1/5/15 11:51 AM, Roger (K8RI) on TT wrote:
On 1/4/2015 5:47 PM, Mike wrote:
http://www.kf7p.com/KF7P/SafetyStand.html

I can't imagine they'd patent it as it's such a logical design. Just a
platform with hooks.
Logical is supposed to be a reason for patent refusal.

"obvious" is the actual word in the patent world you're thinking of.

Something is patentable if it is a non-obvious combination of everyday things. Maybe you're using spare knives and forks in a clever combination to secure the platform to the tower.

It says "patent pending"...
without seeing the patent application, you don't know what is actually the patentable part. It could be some small piece of it: the hook design, or clips, or something else. It could even be a design patent, where what is being patented is essentially the physical appearance.



_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>