Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Best Balun

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Best Balun
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 21:31:29 -0800
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On Wed,11/26/2014 1:50 PM, Wilson wrote:
  As for balance, there’s a good bit of impedance in a wavelength or two of 
coax shield, so I doubt if the shield end at the top is actually very near ground.
         This is mentioned in the list of factors someone gave.  No doubt, but 
how much does it affect the pattern?

WL,

A good common mode choke prevents the feedline from being part of the antenna. Does that matter much on transmit? NO, EXCEPT if it puts RF in your shack. Does it matter on receive? YES! because the signal picked on the feedline couples to the antenna and fills in the nulls in the pattern. Goodbye front-to-back and front-to-side rejection. Hello NOISE.


I’m not competent to make analytical arguments about which choke is best, but 
rather I maintain that using the ARRL choke and getting the Z of the choke close to 
ten times the feedline Z is likely to be all anyone needs.

In the link I posted, I showed that RESISTIVE choking Z on the order 5,000 ohms (10X your "rule of thumb") is a far better design goal, both for the decoupling concerns (TX and RX) and for power handling. I also showed why chokes must be resistive, not inductive, which means that they must be multi-turn chokes on #43 or #31 cores.

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>