Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Cadweld vs clamps

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Cadweld vs clamps
From: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 13:37:19 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>

Lightning may not care about a half ohm resistance, but anything else that might care about the volt drop across a half ohm at currents typical in a lightning discharge sure as hell would.

Dave   AB7E



On 10/25/2014 12:43 PM, Bill Turner wrote:
------------ ORIGINAL MESSAGE ------------(may be snipped)

On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 17:22:58 -0400, Roger wrote:

Seeing actual clamps that can be lifted off the ground rods after a
couple years is no old wives tale.  It was that way on our house.

Corrosion even raising the contact
resistance to a half ohm leaves little protection from lightening.
REPLY:

With all due respect, those two statements defy common sense.

First, properly tightened bolts do not come loose except perhaps with
vibration, which of course is not present here. If anything, corrosion
makes things tighter, not looser. I suspect the original clamps were
installed but never tightened at all. Simple human error. It happens.

Second, a lightning bolt cares nothing about a half ohm connection. It
has already traveled through millions of ohms of air, another half ohm
in series is nothing. And of course, when the lightning arcs through
the half ohm, ionization makes the resistance go to an even lower
value.

73, Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>