Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Fwd: Fwd: Guyed + self supporting /2 ??

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Fwd: Guyed + self supporting /2 ??
From: Hans Hammarquist via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Hans Hammarquist <hanslg@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 14:28:55 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Doug,


I have to correct one of your statements: Any metal structure, in general, is 
stronger in tension than in compression. This doesn't change your point, though.


Hans - N2JFS



-----Original Message-----
From: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
To: 'Hans Hammarquist' <hanslg@aol.com>; Tower Talk <towertalk@contesting.com>; 
'Roger (K8RI) on TT' <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Sent: Sat, Oct 18, 2014 12:51 pm
Subject: RE: [TowerTalk] Fwd:  Guyed + self supporting /2 ??


I have a hard time, like you, understanding why some folks think guying any
self supporting tower is a bad idea.  Some folks over analyze and over
engineer something that has been successfully done for years.

A tower is stronger in compression than in tension.  The effectiveness of
the guying depends on how the guys are attached to the tower (one leg or an
equalizer bracket), how much tension is placed on the guys, how far the guys
are from the base of the tower, and how many levels of guys are used.

Guying a self supporter is going to allow higher wind loading, whether it is


 
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>