Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] FW: Is A Tower Weaker in Some Directions?

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] FW: Is A Tower Weaker in Some Directions?
From: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 03:19:20 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
>>  A properly designed and constructed guyed tower will not impose downward 
>> force on the legs.  

Gene,

Not flaming, but this would be magic.  Any wind loading with a component normal 
to the axis of the cable increases its tension.  Lest Newton roll over in his 
grave, that tension imparts reactions at the tower connection with both a 
horizontal and vertical components.  The vertical component of that reaction 
can only be in the direction of the cable - which is downward.  

Matt
KM5VI


-----Original Message-----
From: TowerTalk [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jim 
Thomson
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 2:37 AM
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: [TowerTalk] Is A Tower Weaker in Some Directions?

Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2014 17:02:10 -0400
From: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@verizon.net>
To: "'Patrick Greenlee'" <patrick_g@windstream.net>, 
<towertalk-bounces@contesting.com>, "'Cox, Norman R.'" <nrc@mst.edu>, 
<towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Is A Tower Weaker in Some Directions?

     If the wind were to blow normal to one face of a tower, the opposite 
single leg would be the weakest.  Assuming the cross-bracing holds (does not
fail) upon exposure to high winds, the windward legs of the tower will be in 
tension, i.e., the wind will attempt to elongate them when they bend away from 
the wind.  The remaining leg on the opposite side of the tower will be in 
compression, i.e., the wind will attempt to force it downward.  This sole leg 
must withstand this downward, compressive force by itself.  It will deform 
(bend) when sufficient downward force has been placed upon it, much as a 
human's knees would buckle if that human were required to support heavier and 
heavier loads on his shoulders.

     Now consider the case when the wind is from the single leg side of the 
tower and towards the opposite face.  The single windward leg will be in 
tension and the two opposite legs will be in compression.  Unlike the first 
example with the wind applied on the face, the two leeward legs of the tower 
resist the downward force from the wind with twice the counteracting force of a 
single leg.  To get this tower's two legs to buckle will require twice the wind 
force on the opposite leg vs the single leg example above.

     A properly designed and constructed guyed tower will not impose downward 
force on the legs.  The windward guy(s) will counteract the wind force and keep 
the tower erect.  The guys should not deflect sufficiently to allow a downward 
force to be applied to the leeward leg(s).  This is why the foundation of a 
guyed tower need not be massive: it will merely resist the dead weight of the 
tower and its antenna loads.  There will be no wind-caused overturning moment 
applied to the base as is the case with a self-supporting tower and its massive 
concrete base.  

     This is also why one must not guy a tapered, self-supporting tower.
Guys impact unnecessary downward vertical force on the structure.  If you 
believe you must guy a SS structure, then re-check your design and select a 
"beefier" tower.  And ditch the guys.


73 de
Gene Smar  AD3F

##  he has a freestanding crank up tower.. US tower corp  HDX-555.... not a 
guyed 25/45 G type tower.   He cant guy  the HDX-555, even if he wanted to. 
Your structural analysis theory is flawed.   You wont see any difference if 
any,  regardless of  base orientation. 

##  as far as guying a freestanding, tapered tower, its done all the time.  
It’s the strongest structure there is.   The legs will easily handle the 
downward force.

Jim  VE7RF 





_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>