Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical LW vs. Vertical

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical LW vs. Vertical
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 18:59:57 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 4/10/2014 5:30 PM, Tom Osborne wrote:
HI All

Is there a lot of difference between a vertical long wire antenna and a regular vertical GP?

Not much.  Just the angle of the dangle. :)


Last year when camping I used a 65 foot piece of wire up into a tree, hooked directly to the output of my tuner. I had one long counterpoise and the tuner connected to a ground that I drove INTO the ground.. It seemed to work pretty well on all the bands.

A counterpoise and/or radials are a GOOD thing. A connection to the earth does NOT make an antenna work better, because the earth is really a very large resistor. One of the functions of a good radial system is to SHIELD the antenna from the earth.

Not having any modeling software here, what I was interested in is if the vertical LW works different than a vertical GP.

The length of the vertical (as a fraction of a wavelength affects the vertical pattern. Study what happens to a 43 ft vertical on the bands above 20M to see what I'm talking about.

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>