Its just the opposite. Its intended to transfer the force FROM the
slipping u-bolts TO the Slipp-Nott.
Dino - KX6D
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Slipp-Nott
From: John Becker <johnb3030@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, December 21, 2013 10:06 am
To: towertalk@contesting.com
> I see nothing wrong with the slipp-nott design if used with enough
> rotator. Unfortunately many rotators depend on the mast slipping to
> protect the rotator.
>
> 73,
>
> Roger (K8RI)
The problem I see with the design is that it transfers the force to the
U-bolts, which are not intended to withstand that. They may hold if they
are large enough, but I feel it still is a misapplication, a case of
using something in a manner for which it was not intended by the
original designer. Also to be considered is the fact that if a U-bolt
fails you have gone from an annoyance to a big problem.
73,
John, K9MM
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|