Good engineering won't catch everything inside nature's bell curve, and
the lack of good engineering doesn't mean that something will fail.
Those who use either case to ignore the physics of any particular
situation are .... well, let's just say there is a reason that "ignore"
and "ignorant" have the same root.
Dave AB7E
On 12/4/2013 10:39 AM, Drax Felton wrote:
Having read this forum since 2008 and, I having built four towers in the
interim, have been led to believe they all should've collapsed by now.
Yet they stand, my log book full, and seem in no danger. Now certainly nature
can find a way, but most of the time she misses.
On Dec 3, 2013, at 10:53 PM, EZ Rhino <EZRhino@fastmovers.biz> wrote:
HAHA!! Good one! It's so true. So true.
More time playing radio, less time critiquing.
Chris
KF7P
On Dec 3, 2013, at 20:51 , Drax Felton wrote:
On Tower Talk no antenna is ever sufficiently patterned, no tower base ever
deep enough, nor wide enough, nor is cable greasy enough, nor is any guy
anchored stoutly enough. Such is its nature. [Corinthians 177:13]
-----Original Message-----
When I posted my question earlier I did not want this to become a debate as
to the pros and cons of my Mosley. In fact I considered not mentioning it my
name except that I wanted everyone to have all the facts.
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|