Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Change in SWR

To: Tower Talk <TowerTalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Change in SWR
From: Drax Felton <draxfelton@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 12:39:07 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Having read this forum since 2008 and, I having built four towers in the 
interim, have been led to believe they all should've collapsed by now.  

Yet they stand, my log book full, and seem in no danger.  Now certainly nature 
can find a way, but most of the time she misses.




> On Dec 3, 2013, at 10:53 PM, EZ Rhino <EZRhino@fastmovers.biz> wrote:
> 
> HAHA!! Good one!  It's so true. So true.
> 
> More time playing radio, less time critiquing.
> 
> Chris
> KF7P
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Dec 3, 2013, at 20:51 , Drax Felton wrote:
> 
> On Tower Talk no antenna is ever sufficiently patterned, no tower base ever
> deep enough, nor wide enough, nor is cable greasy enough, nor is any guy
> anchored stoutly enough.  Such is its nature.  [Corinthians 177:13]
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> When I posted my question earlier I did not want this to become a debate as
> to the pros and cons of my Mosley. In fact I considered not mentioning it my
> name except that I wanted everyone to have all the facts.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> 
> 
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>