I used Penetrox supplied by Mosley and had their beams up
for over 44 years. I also used Penetrox on Rohn 25G and on
Heigths aluminum tower sections. These beams and towers
were taken down and reassembled a couple of time when I moved.
In every case the sections were easy to take apart after years of
service. Mosley antennas sleeved sections are all premeasured and
drilled for stainless screws. There are no hose clamps like on
antennas I had from Cushcraft which allowed some slippage which
to me was quite unsatisfactory. No pop rivets, Scotch tape or rubber-
bands either :-)
73
Dave -N4DB-
________________________________
From: Mickey Baker <fishflorida@gmail.com>
To: Gavin J. Roberts <robertsmg@aol.com>
Cc: "towertalk@contesting.com" <TowerTalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 4:54 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Penetrox/Noalox vs. Anti-seize compound
You'll likely be fine with the sleeved sections, but to prevent stainless
steel hardware galling, put Permatex on all the threads of all the bolts
where they mate with nuts. Don't forget hose clamps!
73,
Mickey Baker N4MB
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Gavin J. Roberts <robertsmg@aol.com> wrote:
> Hello, all:
>
>
> I spent a good part of this last weekend assembling a Mosley 4 element
> beam from new. Mosley supplies a small quantity of Penetrox with the
> antenna and encourages its liberal application during assembly. I
> exhausted the limited amount supplied and wanted to finish putting things
> together, so I headed for the local hardware store which carried an
> anti-seize compound called Permatex. As far as I know, this compound does
> not contain any particles to promote conductivity between the joints, but
> rather is more of a petroleum jelly based lubricant. Realizing this fact
> after finishing assembly, I ordered some additional Penetrox this morning
> from DX Engineering (they carry both Penetrox as well as Permatex). When I
> asked their technical support staff whether it would be wise to re-do the"
> Permatex-ed" joints with Penetrox before raising the beam, he seemed to
> feel that it would not be worth the trouble to substitute a more conductive
> material for the less conductive one. His r
> easoning was that enough bare aluminum-to-aluminum surface area would
> remain that the use of the Permatex was very unlikely to negatively effect
> antenna performance. Anyone have an opinion on this? Should I re-do the
> joints in question while the antenna is still on the ground? Or would this
> be a needless exercise at this point?
>
>
> Thanks and 73 de
>
>
> Gavin W9YE
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
--
Mickey Baker, N4MB
Fort Lauderdale, FL
*“Tell me, and I will listen. Show me, and I will understand. Involve me,
and I will learn.” *Teton Lakota, American Indian Saying.
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|