Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Variable phasing was: Re: [CQ-Contest] Stacking on separ

To: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Variable phasing was: Re: [CQ-Contest] Stacking on separate towers, take off angles?
From: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 09:32:13 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Here's the patent:

http://www.google.com/patents?id=_WU6AAAAEBAJ&printsec=abstract&zoom=4&client=internal-uds#v=onepage&q&f=false

73, Roger

Pete Smith N4ZR wrote:
I've been trying to remember specifics about a phasing system that was sold commercially for a few years back in the 70s or 80s. It used two verticals and, depending on settings on the desktop, could vary the phasing of the verticals over a wide range, producing all sorts of patterns. Anyone recall, or even have one in the basement?

73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at
http://reversebeacon.net,
blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com.
For spots, please go to your favorite
ARC V6 or VE7CC DX cluster node.

On 3/17/2013 6:04 PM, Brian Alsop wrote:
For amateurs, the problem is one of putting too much power in side lobes and not into the main lobe. It would take some kind of variable phasing network to resolve.

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk


--
Remember the Liberty (AGTR-5)
http://www.usslibertyveterans.org/
http://www.gtr5.com/

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>