Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] grounding elevated vertical for lightning?

To: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>, <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] grounding elevated vertical for lightning?
From: "Gene Fuller" <w2lu@rochester.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 19:50:45 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Why not an RF choke for static drain/noise purposes across a spark gap for direct hit purposes ?
Gene / W2LU


----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2013 7:18 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] grounding elevated vertical for lightning?


On 2/9/13 12:43 PM, Mark Robinson wrote:
Could he not also ground through an rf choke to bleed off static?

At first that's what I thought, but OP was looking for lightning protection.

And, if you wanted to operate top band, for instance, a choke that has high Z at 2MHz is also going to have high Z for lightning (which has a lot of its power around 1 MHz). Even for 80m, it would be tricky..



_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>