To: | towertalk@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] grounding elevated vertical for lightning? |
From: | Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net> |
Date: | Fri, 08 Feb 2013 13:37:04 -0800 |
List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
On 2/8/13 10:36 AM, Jim Brown wrote: Exactly... this was one of the interesting non-intuitive findings when NEC3 and NEC4 were being validated: antenna performance with radials alone was better than with the ground rod added.On 2/8/2013 5:52 AM, K1TTT wrote:What is the best way to ground this antenna? Can I put a few ground rods at the center base and run them up to the radial junction?NO! The work of Rudy Severns, N6LF, on the topic of elevated radials shows that elevated radials should NOT be grounded, because doing so causes radial currents to be unbalanced, which increases loss. For the same reason, a common mode choke must be used on the coax at the feedpoint. I assume you want to ground for lightning protection? Then a spark gap is your friend. Open circuit for RF, but when lightning strikes, it closes. Hook the spark gap to your ground rods and to your antenna, and you're all set. A 1/10" gap breaks down at 7kV. Needle gap is more like 2kV. _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Thrust bearing question, Larry Catron |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] grounding elevated vertical for lightning?, Jeff Blaine |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] grounding elevated vertical for lightning?, Jim Brown |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] grounding elevated vertical for lightning?, Jeff Blaine |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |