Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: balanced line loss on a mismatched antenna

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: balanced line loss on a mismatched antenna
From: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 09:50:43 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Going back over the years, there have been numerous debates here on 
towertalk on the correctness of those tables - and not just the 26-foot 
number.

73, Pete N4ZR
The World Contest Station Database, updated daily at www.conteststations.com
The Reverse Beacon Network at http://reversebeacon.net, blog at 
reversebeacon.blogspot.com,
spots at telnet.reversebeacon.net, port 7000 and
arcluster.reversebeacon.net, port 7000


On 3/1/2012 9:23 AM, Jim Lux wrote:
> On 3/1/12 12:31 AM, Steve Hunt wrote:
>> The ARRL Antenna Book has a section on "Resonance in Guy Wires" which
>> includes a chart of lengths to avoid for the eight HF amateur bands.
>>    From that chart, 26ft would be a **good choice** to avoid problems on
>> every band except 17m.
>>
>> I've no idea where N2IC got the idea that 26ft would cause "major
>> pattern distortion" on 20m, 15m and 10m!
>>
> Just getting it flipped around.
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>