Excel spreadsheet xlzizl does all that I think. You'd have to run nec to get
the table of feed z vs freq
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
-----Original Message-----
From: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Sender: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:18:50
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] tuners and power rating
Using TLD, I first ran a simulation on 80m using LMR-400 and a 250 ohm load
for a 5:1 VSWR. I ran the coax length from an electrical 1/4 wave through a
1/2 wave.
Total loss at 1/4 wave of line: 0.34 dB; 40% conductor loss, 50% SWR loss.
Z at the tuner is 10 ohms.
Total Loss at 1/2 wave of line : 0.66 dB (percentage of loss attributed to
conductor and SWR is essentially the same). Z at tuner is 217 ohms.
So at first it may seem like a quarter-wave section of line has the lower
system loss. But, there's a factor missing here: The tuner. If the tuner
has high Q components and a high output C value, a 10 ohm load may still
result in lower system losses. OTOH, if the tuner has low-Q components at
the operating F and insufficient output C, then the system using the
quarter-wave line may have substantially more loss.
VK1OD tries to address the total system losses in his charts. I believe he
chooses typical component values when addressing losses through a T type
tuner. To get the real losses requires knowing more about the tuner type
and Q of tuner components from 160m through 10m. The L and C values are
often disclosed by the manufacturer. But equally important, charts should
be provided that address Q values, especially Q of L as L changes. Armed
with that information, EZNEC (to get antenna terminal Z), a transmission
line calculator like TLD, and the W9CF tuner loss calculator, we can compute
accurate loss figures as well as conduct "what if" analysis by changing
values.
A really cool program would incorporate a basic NEC function (say...just for
horizontal dipole types), TLD, and W9CF's tuner calculator. One program to
vary antenna length/height, line length/type, and tuner component values
with variable Q. That would tell the whole story. Any takers?
Paul, W9AC
----- Original Message -----
From: "jimlux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
To: "Rik van Riel" <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 9:25 AM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] tuners and power rating
> Rik van Riel wrote:
>> On 11/28/2010 10:56 PM, DJ7WW wrote:
>>> A tuner working into a 5:1 mismatch would not improve the antenna and
>>> feed
>>> line loss anyway.
>>> A tuner is the wrong approach to compensate a bad antenna design.
>>
>> A 5:1 mismatch can be entirely reasonable depending on the band,
>> the antenna, etc...
>>
>> For example on 160m and 80m it is common to have high impedances
>> at the band edges, because these bands are just so wide (as a
>> percentage of the center freq).
>>
>> However, a 5:1 mismatch at 2 MHz with 100' of LMR-400 coax only
>> results in an SWR loss of 0.4 dB.
>
> It's too early in the morning for me to run the numbers, but in a
> mismatch situation, the coax loss could be much higher:
> 1) 100 ft of coax is a lot less than a wavelength at 160m. Loss in coax
> at HF frequencies is dominated by the I^2*R losses, and if the Z at the
> antenna is low, currents will be high To get the "average" mismatch loss
> (figured by looking at the circulating power in the feedline between
> tuner and load), the feedline needs to be an integer wavelength long.
>
> (Hmm, let's see.. 5:1 VSWR = 5:1 ISWR = Imax*Imin = Iavg^2, so Imax =
> sqrt(5)*Iavg, so loss max = 5*loss avg, for a short feedline with low Z
> load)
>
>
>>
>> That 0.4dB of feedline loss (.26 of which due to SWR) may be a
>> perfectly reasonable tradeoff...
>>
>> Now, at 29 MHz that same 5:1 SWR could be a big problem - but
>> you don't need to have that kind of SWR on 10m :)
>>
>> You can calculate the (SWR related) feedline losses quite easily
>> with one of the online coax calculators, eg:
>>
>> http://www.saarsham.net/coax.html
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|