Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] 6BTV vs HF2Vvsr DX Engineering 10-80 vertical, or Force

To: "Tom Anderson" <andersonww5l@sbcglobal.net>, <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 6BTV vs HF2Vvsr DX Engineering 10-80 vertical, or Force 12 flagpole
From: "Frosty" <frosty1@pdq.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 15:45:13 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Tom none of those antennas will out play the HF2V. The only antenna that 
will do better is one that is at least 65 feet tall with at least 20 65 foot 
radials.


Charles F. Frost
Frosty K5LBU
frosty1@pdq.net


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tom Anderson" <andersonww5l@sbcglobal.net>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 3:26 PM
Subject: [TowerTalk] 6BTV vs HF2Vvsr DX Engineering 10-80 vertical,or Force 
12 flagpole


> Fellow Tower Talkians:
>
> A friend of mine gave me a Hustler 6BTV vertical which I was planning on 
> using to supplement my 40/80 inverted vee at 50 feet and my Tennadyne T-10 
> log periodic.
>
> Just wondering how the 6BTV plays against something like a Butternut HF2V, 
> DX Engineering's 40 ft 10-80 vertical, or Force 12s flagpole vertical? 
> Looking mainly for something decent on 40/80.
>
> Tom, WW5L
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk 

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>