Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Reduced size receiving antennas

To: towertalk@contesting.com, K3VX <k3vx@verizon.net>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Reduced size receiving antennas
From: Steven Kerns <n3fti@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 07:01:03 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
We used a Flag antenna on 160M & 80M two seperate years in our MM winning 
efforts from VP5A and VQ5A a few years back when we did not have room for 
beverages.

They seemed to be directional, but nowhere as good as a properly built multi 
wavelenght beverage.

Steve, N3FTI

--- On Wed, 12/9/09, K3VX <k3vx@verizon.net> wrote:

> From: K3VX <k3vx@verizon.net>
> Subject: [TowerTalk] Reduced size receiving antennas
> To: towertalk@contesting.com
> Date: Wednesday, December 9, 2009, 9:19 AM
> 
> TTers,
> 
> Has anyone built a reduced size version of the K9AY
> terminated loop(s)?
> 
>  If so what are the consequences (besides the obvious
> reduction in capture area).
> 
> Same question for pennants and flags.
> 
> The reason for the question is a very long and skinny 
> backyard.
> 
> TIA and 73
> 
> Larry K3VX
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> 


      
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>