This kind of stuff needs to (also?) be on the Ham-Law reflector -
The Ham-Law Mailing List. This list is for discussion and does not purport
to give legal advice.
Submissions: ham-law@mail.altlaw.com
Subscribe and unsubscribe: listserver@mail.altlaw.com
Use "(un)subscribe ham-law@mail.altlaw.com" on a new line in the text.
73, de Jim KG0KP
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave LaBat" <labatd@ca.rr.com>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 1:40 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] City attempts to shut down ham radio .... !!
> Ok, their presentation is a little "different" but perhaps the esteemed
> members of this list would like to read the city of Palmdale's proposal
> that
> is going before the city council tonight. The recommendation and
> justification is at
> http://www.cityofpalmdale.org/city_hall/Planning/2009-07/AMeeting/spl70978h.pdf
> it is more than a little scary. The contention of the city council is that
> the city may have lost in court, but the court told us how we can make it
> unreasonable for any radio amateur to have any antennas that are effective
> and we can do it legally, so we will.
>
> If I read the proposal correctly to have a tower than is no more than 25
> feet higher than an existing structure you must get all your neighbors
> signatures saying they have no objection, you must justify why you need
> THAT
> MUCH height, you must tell the city how much power you will use (???) and
> the city can hire a "consultant" to determine if your justification is
> reasonable..... at YOUR expense. Want to guess how much putting in 5
> sections of 25G just went up to in the city of Palmdale, if you can do it
> all?
>
> I understand why they are excited.
>
> Dave NT6AA
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <kq6i@arrl.net>
> To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
> Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 9:17 AM
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] City attempts to shut down ham radio .... !!
>
>
>> Titled "Antenna Envy".
>>
>> rgrds
>> Craig
>> kq6i
>> Peace, long-life, and gud DX!
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: N7mal [mailto:n7mal@citlink.net]
>> Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 9:52 AM
>> To: towertalk@contesting.com
>> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] City attempts to shut down ham radio .... !!
>>
>> Didn't I see those 2 in a porn flick.... :-)
>>
>> MAL
>> N7MAL
>> BULLHEAD CITY, AZ
>> http://www.n7mal.com
>> Everyone in the world is
>> entitled to be burdened
>> by my opinion
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Pete Smith
>> To: D.G.
>> Cc: wosborne44@gmail.com ; TOWERTALK@contesting.com ; john@kk9a.com
>> Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 1:33
>> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] City attempts to shut down ham radio .... !!
>>
>>
>> This guy again? He must think we've forgotten the last round.
>>
>> 73, Pete N4ZR
>>
>>
>>
>> On 7/8/2009 8:57 PM, D.G. wrote:
>>> City attempts to shut down ham radio .... !!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_d5B9UPw_10
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|