The WWV "halfwave" vertical is actually a quarter wave vertical with
sloping, elevated radials.
It can also be seen as a center fed half wave vertical dipole. No
magic.
I have personally used one of these on 40m for many years, with good
effect.
Held regular skeds with VS6DO from the east coast on 40, for several
years.
The idea is to get the high current portion of the antenna as high as
you can.
From what I've read about vertical performance, the use of on-ground
radials
not connected to the antenna, is of marginal value. Possibly of
zero value.
What is most important is the first reflection zone, which lies
outside the quarter
wave circle. This impacts the 'pseudo-Brewster Angle', below which
a reflected
wave is refracted into the earth. It's a function of the index of
refraction of the
medium (earth), and the better it is (like salt water), the lower the
radiation angle
of the antenna.
Radials would have to be quite long and dense, to significantly
improve ground conductivity
in that first reflection zone. For most amateurs, that would be
outside our property, outside our control,
and outside most rational budgets.
The WWV website indicates that they took care to keep feedlines from
crossing.
I can see no purpose for this, other than convenience of installation.
AS TO THE ORGINAL QUESTION: Vertical vs. Beam... there are so many
variables
that are site and antenna dependent that this question can only be
answered by trying it.
It is true that modelling software will answer the question about
gain in a particular direction
and elevation. But in order to understand what the models tell you,
you need to define what
you're trying to accomplish. Others have said this quite well.
My 40m elevated GP was compared with a 2 el CC @ 70', with two
identical stations about
15 miles apart, working guys in EU, stateside, and into Asia. The
GP was always 2 s units louder
than the beam in Hong Kong. In EU, it was a tossup, and stateside,
the beam always won.
The one exception to the asian path was during a greyline when
skewpath down the south pacific
was open. The beam was much much louder, and the vertical suffered
from severe multipathing
requiring that code speeds be slowed, to copy.
In general, I would prefer to have a 2 el 40 @ 90' than the vertical
dipole, if I could only have one.
But if the choice were to put that beam @ 50'... I'd go vertical,
with an elevated feedpoint.
You don't need a model for that. If the choice were a tribander @
50' vs. a vertical for 20... I'd
pick the beam, and go vertical for 40, 80, 160.
N2EA
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|