Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] DX Engineering 66-Foot Vertical?

To: TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] DX Engineering 66-Foot Vertical?
From: RICHARD SOLOMON <w1ksz@q.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 05:24:55 +0000
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
What I did was to run a small (1/4" dia) Poly rope the length of the vertical.

Epoxied it at the top, pulled on it to apply tension and epoxied the rope to

the bottom.

 

73, Dick, W1KSZ
 
> Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:59:54 -0700
> From: jimlux@earthlink.net
> To: richard@karlquist.com
> CC: towertalk@contesting.com; K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] DX Engineering 66-Foot Vertical?
> 
> Richard (Rick) Karlquist wrote:
> >> What I worry about in that case is oscillation under the right wind 
> >> conditions.
> > 
> >> Roger (K8RI)
> > 
> > After much experimenting, I have learned something about the oscillation
> > problem:
> > 
> > 1. The worst design is a uniform diameter vertical guyed at equal
> > intervals. This is somewhat obvious from physics.
> > 
> > 2. Tapering the diameters is very helpful.
> > 
> > 3. For really flimsy verticals, I guy every 15 feet
> > 
> > 4. Oscillation may not cause immediate failures, but instead
> > the cumulative effects of fatigue will eventually reach the breaking
> > point.
> 
> Particularly with aluminum..(DeHavilland Comets and all that)
> 
> 
> What about wrapping a rope in a spiral around the outside of the element 
> to kill the aeolian vibration (like they use on car antennas these days)?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>