Yes Sir, I did. That's why I bought the Force 12 C3XLD.
73, Jerry W5KP
Dan Hearn wrote:
> Did you ever stop to think that the usual tri band trapped beam uses a single
> coax feed for all bands and to get a 50 ohm feed point impedance it is
> necessary to detune the elements from their best length for gain or f/b. In
> addition, the element spacing is the same for all bands so another compromise
> there.
> 73, Dan, N5AR
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Jerry K
> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 7:05 AM
> To: Tower Talk
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Lossy traps?
>
> A fixed element non-trapped tribander with only three elements appears
> to be an oxymoron. In the only comparison I can offer, I ran a standard
> Moseley TA-33 trapped tribander for years with decent results, finally
> went to a Force 12 C3XLD (3 bands, no traps, but F12 doesn't call it a
> "tribander") and the difference was literally astonishing. But the F12
> was a $1400 antenna with 10 full-length elements on a 33' boom with
> separate feeds for each, weighs 75 lb, and is essentially three
> monobanders on a common boom (10M used 4 elements). From day one the
> Force 12 was the proverbial 'nuclear weapon' in a pileup. The difference
> was dramatic, and yes, people 5000 miles away and more certainly did
> notice the difference. Just for fun, I also occasionally ran QRP to that
> antenna and had a blast trying to convince Europeans I really was
> running only 800mw. :)
> 73, Jerry W5KP
>
> foxbw@comcast.net wrote:
>
>> How "lossy" are traps on a trap tri-bander? Some manufacturers of
>> non-trapped tri-banders cite the lossy aspect of traps, but how real is that
>> loss? Can it be measured? Would someone 500 or 5000 miles away notice
>> the difference between a trapped tri-bander and a similar tri-bander
>> antenna without traps? Notice I said tri-bander, not mono-bander, SteppIRs,
>> etc.
>>
>> Anyone have any idea?
>>
>> TNX / 73,
>>
>> Barry - W1HFN
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|