Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] New project

To: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>, TowerTalk Post <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] New project
From: Jim Idelson <k1ir@designet.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 07:13:41 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Correct. There are pros and cons to every approach. The noise issue may not be 
a problem in many situations. If it is, I believe it can be addressed. When the 
antennas are not being turned, much of the wind-induced rattling can be 
eliminated by doing a good job of securing all the cables to the tower and 
tightening up all mechanical connections. Keeping the system quiet when the 
rotators are active is a different story. I was using a HyGain rotator, and the 
brake is a very significant contributor of noise. A worm gear-driven rotator 
would probably be much quieter.

In my opinion, a short bracketed tower is a whole lot simpler and aesthetically 
more acceptable than a guyed tower of the same height located right next to the 
house.

> That sounds like a good argument AGAINST house bracketing, not
FOR it...

Happy trails.    ///  K8JHR  ///
===========================================================

Jim Idelson wrote:

> The only negative thing I have observed with a house-bracketed tower is the 
> transmission of vibrations into the house. My installation happens to be on 
> the end of the house where my daughter's bedroom is. She has complained about 
> rattling, banging and rotor vibrations, so I currently don't have anything up 
> there.

===========================================================

<



Jim Idelson K1IR
email    k1ir at designet.com
web    http://www.k1ir.com
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>