Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted L for 160 meters

To: "Jim McLaughlin" <dearborn9@sbcglobal.net>,"David Gilbert" <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted L for 160 meters
From: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 20:50:39 -0400
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
The sign of a very insecure person with a high level of self doubt is when 
the most intelligent statement they can make is a personal attack.

Thankfully, only a very tiny minority with that personality are on this 
reflector.

Carl
KM1H



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim McLaughlin" <dearborn9@sbcglobal.net>
To: "David Gilbert" <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>; "jeremy-ca" 
<km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Cc: "TowerTalk" <towertalk@contesting.com>; "Jim Brown" 
<jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 8:19 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted L for 160 meters


> Dave,
>
> Maybe if possible just forget him. You've seen him do that before and he
> will again. He is just one of those 'self proclaimed' experts who will
> always have either more or better data then anybody else. You will never
> hear him admit that he is wrong and it will be an endless battle and not
> worth your  effort.
>
> Jim-    WA9FPT
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "David Gilbert" <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
> To: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
> Cc: "TowerTalk" <towertalk@contesting.com>; "Jim Brown"
> <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 5:50 PM
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted L for 160 meters
>
>
>>
>> I don't get it.  That's going to generate several thousand documents to
>> wade through, most of which won't address your claim.  Why come back
>> with such an obtuse and evasive answer if you actually have the
>> references?  I think you just make this junk up and then try to bully
>> your way through the responses.
>>
>> Dave   AB7E
>>
>>
>>
>> jeremy-ca wrote:
>>>>> BC band engineers have proven that an elevated
>>>>> system delivers the same field strength OR BETTER than a classic 128
>>>>> buried radials at the same site.
>>>>>
>>>> Perhaps you might cite the specific references in the literature that
>>>> say that. The ones I've read don't say that.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I guess you can find them the same way I did; try Google. I'll even give
>>> you
>>> a couple of key words to assist. Elevated Radials; Unipole; Folded
>>> Unipole;
>>> Broadcast Antennas to name a few.
>>>
>>> Carl
>>> KM1H
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> 73,
>>>>
>>>> Jim Brown K9YC
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> TowerTalk mailing list
>>>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TowerTalk mailing list
>>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> 

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>