----- Original Message -----
From: "David Gilbert" <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
To: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Cc: "TowerTalk" <towertalk@contesting.com>; "Jim Brown"
<jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 6:50 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted L for 160 meters
>
> I don't get it. That's going to generate several thousand documents to
> wade through, most of which won't address your claim.
More guesswork on your part as usual. Did you actually try to find them or
are you in grandstanding mode again? You seem to favor that mode.
Why come back
> with such an obtuse and evasive answer if you actually have the
> references?
I dont HAVE the references saved as I can read what I need and commit to
memory. My Internet searches were done about a year ago for my own interest
and not to satisfy you or anyone else too lazy to do his own research.
I think you just make this junk up and then try to bully
> your way through the responses.
That is a real juvenile statement.
I have no intention of having you try to goad me into an argument that will
just aggravate Steve.
Carl
KM1H
>
> Dave AB7E
>
>
>
> jeremy-ca wrote:
>>>> BC band engineers have proven that an elevated
>>>> system delivers the same field strength OR BETTER than a classic 128
>>>> buried radials at the same site.
>>>>
>>> Perhaps you might cite the specific references in the literature that
>>> say that. The ones I've read don't say that.
>>>
>>
>>
>> I guess you can find them the same way I did; try Google. I'll even give
>> you
>> a couple of key words to assist. Elevated Radials; Unipole; Folded
>> Unipole;
>> Broadcast Antennas to name a few.
>>
>> Carl
>> KM1H
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> 73,
>>>
>>> Jim Brown K9YC
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TowerTalk mailing list
>>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|