Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] exploding foundations and semanticquibblesregarding Ufer

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] exploding foundations and semanticquibblesregarding Ufer & "Single Point" grounds
From: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:52:39 +0200
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
It does not matter what kind of ground system you use as long the conductors
are not running through the concrete but outside to prevent explosion of the
concrete.

Peter 

-----Original Message-----
From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of W7CE
Sent: Freitag, 14. September 2007 14:58
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] exploding foundations and semantic
quibblesregarding Ufer & "Single Point" grounds

>
> It was written, regarding UFER grounds:
>
> "Sinking the ground rod several inches below the bottom of the 
> foundation hole and only running copper wire out the bottom of the 
> concrete is no problem. If house foundations use copper wire for Ufer 
> grounds, then it sounds safe to assume that copper embedded in 
> concrete does not eventually corrode away."
>
> WRONG!  You want to divert strike current around the tower foundation, 
> not through it.  The conductor will be evaporated, exploding the 
> foundation.
>

So are you saying that you don't believe in Ufer grounds?  If I understand
them correctly, the whole point is to develop a low impedance path to ground
through the concrete. 

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>