Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] guy levels ?

To: "Don Moman VE6JY" <dmoman@mcsnet.ca>, <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] guy levels ?
From: Hardy Landskov <n7rt@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:05:06
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Also much easier to tram the antennas up and down when the last guy wire is
5 or 10 feet down.
73 Hardy N7RT


At 03:10 AM 8/22/2007 -0000, Don Moman VE6JY wrote:
>Unless the tower was heavily loaded and therefore required it, I would
>never put the guy at the very top. It is MUCH easier to work around the
>top of the tower if the guy is 5 feet down.  
>
>73 Don
>VE6JY
>
>
>...If you are only using the top of your tower, I would place the 
>guys at 30', 60' and 90'.
>
>John KK9A
>***********************************
>I was under the impression that one shouldn't guy a tower at regular
>spacings, because the wind can excite standing vibrational modes in the
>tower that can lead to failure. In such modes, the vibrational standing
>wave nodes would be at the guy anchor points. I thought non-integer
>spacing of guy wires was recommended to eliminate this possibility. Am I
>wrong about this?
>
>Jim W8ZR
>
>_________________________________
>
>_______________________________________________
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>TowerTalk mailing list
>TowerTalk@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>