Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] MA5B without the WARC dipole

To: "Richard Hill" <REHill@ix.netcom.com>,"Towertalk@Contesting. Com" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] MA5B without the WARC dipole
From: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 21:32:49 -0600
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Um, the MA5B is a three-element design with limited capability on WARC 
bands. I've got one.

I've not heard of a WARC dipole accessory, nor is a WARC dipole a 
distinguishable part from the MA5B.

We are talking about the Cushcraft, no?

73, kelly
ve4xt
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard Hill" <REHill@ix.netcom.com>
To: "Towertalk@Contesting. Com" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 7:45 PM
Subject: [TowerTalk] MA5B without the WARC dipole


> I'm considering installing a MA5B two element beam without the WARC 
> dipole.
> Anyone try it and then what changes from standard lengths were necessary?
> What results?  I've heard that 10m does not load well without the WARC
> dipole.
>
> I'll be using this on an extended TV mast that I have to put up and down
> each contest, in a narrow slot, and need to lighten the load.
>
> Thanks for any comments.
>
> NU6T
> Rich
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> 
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>