To: | towertalk@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] Fallen tower may rise again |
From: | "Donald Chester" <k4kyv@hotmail.com> |
Date: | Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:03:37 +0000 |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
If the tower predates airport runway expansion, wouldn't the aiport have to
convince local government authorities to condemn the tower by eminent
domain, and pay the tower owners the full cost of relocating to a
satisfactory location? Has a ham tower ever fallen in this category? What happens if someone decides to build a private airport in the vicinity of your tower, that would put your tower within the airport's restricted zone? What if the city decides to build a new municipal airport? What happens to the existing tall structures in the vicinity? Don k4kyv _______________________________________________________________ This message was typed using the DVORAK keyboard layout. http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak/ http://gigliwood.com/abcd/ _________________________________________________________________ View Athlete?s Collections with Live Search http://sportmaps.live.com/index.html?source=hmemailtaglinenov06&FORM=MGAC01 _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 Email list, Lee Armitage |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Large Arrays, David Thompson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Fallen tower may rise again, K7LXC |
Next by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Tower Grounding, Kirk |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |