Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Questions about Irrigation Pipe for Verticals

To: <richard@karlquist.com>, "Red" <RedHaines@centurytel.net>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Questions about Irrigation Pipe for Verticals
From: "Bob Maser" <bmaser@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 09:17:33 -0500
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Stovepipe tape??  Tacky.  Use aluminum pop rivets.  I used them and had no 
problems for the 7 years that my 4 square was up.  If you're worried about 
conductivity between the two adjoining sections,  just run more power!!

Bob W6TR
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
To: "Red" <RedHaines@centurytel.net>
Cc: "TowerTalk" <towertalk@contesting.com>; "Gary Schafer" 
<garyschafer@comcast.net>
Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2006 2:18 AM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Questions about Irrigation Pipe for Verticals


> You can use aluminum stovepipe tape to bridge the gap.
>
> Rick N6RK
>
>
>
> Red wrote:
>> Hi, Gary;
>>
>> The coupling between a 2" OD and a 2.9" ID (the two pipes) is 46
>> picoFarads per foot.  Guess we better put in the aluminum connections.
>> The reactance of 46 pF is 124 Ohms at 28 MHz and 870 Ohms at 4 MHz, at
>> one foot of overlap.  Hope I didn't lose a decimal place.  It's
>> bedtime!  Better double check my calculations.
>>
>> 73 de Red
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk 

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>