Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Rotor Cable

To: K6TFZ@aol.com, dave@lodave.org, towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Rotor Cable
From: Dave Tipton <dave@lodave.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 06:58:15 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
That is the best answer I've heard.  Everyone seems to be in agreement, but 
that was the first explanation of why, other than "It's too small".
   
  Thanks,
Dave, W5DMT

K6TFZ@aol.com wrote:
  >Ok, so I'm sure it's been asked before, but is there any real problem with 
using Category 5 >cable to control a Ham IV? This is going to be about a 100 
foot run (Thinking 90, but just >being conservative). 

> I just happen to have scads of it laying around and thought it might be an 
inexpensive alternative.

The manual claims a max resistance of 0.8 ohms for terminals 1 and 2, 2.0 
ohms for terminals 3 through 8. It also lists wire sizes of 18 gauge for T 1-2 
and 20 gauge for T 3-8 for a maximum run of 125 feet.

Cat 5 cable is 24 gauge and has a resistance of 3.1 ohms per 100 feet. 

Hope this helps with your decision.

Geoff, K6TFZ
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>