Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] hdbx 48

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] hdbx 48
From: "Mike Brown" <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 04:05:53 -0000
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Not too rag on anyone's tower or anything like that, as I could have read 
this wrong years ago. But it has always stuck in my mind that Rohn said to 
not use any antenna with a boom length of more then 10 feet on  any flavor 
of  BX tower. Although, in this town, it seems like the ham tower of choice.

Mike, K9MI


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tom Anderson" <WW5L@gte.net>
To: "Rick McGaver" <rmcgaver@wi.rr.com>
Cc: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 01:55
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] hdbx 48


>A friend of mine up the road about 2 miles has a KT34XA on an HDBX 56
> foir several years with no problems.
>
> Tom, WW5L
>
> Colleyville TX
>
> Rick McGaver wrote:
>
>>I had a Mosley Pro-57 with a 24' boom on mine for about 10 years.  But to
>>say I wasn't afraid the bugger wasnt going to come down is a under
>>statement.  I finally took it down since my Big Boy failed and now am
>>locating the rotator in the base 44" above ground. Good by twisting and
>>climbing the tower for rotator service.  By the way a C3 is going back up!
>>
>>Rick  NK 9G
>>SE WI
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>TowerTalk mailing list
>>TowerTalk@contesting.com
>>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> 


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>