Rick,
What is the nature of your soil, please?
I am guessing that is the critical factor that will
speak to others about similiar results or not.
> My 160 meter vertical with 20 miles (12 km) of radials
> is indistinguishable on receive (except for absolute level of
> signal and noise) from a 30 foot vertical
> with four 30 foot radials. OTOH, a 40 meter inverted
> vee receives better on 160 than any vertical.
> At least at my QTH. YMMV. Rick N6RK
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Thanks! & 73, doc kd4e
30-70% Off Christian Books, CD's, DVD's, etc.
http://edenacres.bibleseven.com/b2i/b2i-index.html
|_|___|_|
| | & | |
{|
/\ {|
/ \ {|
/ \ {|
/ @ \ {|
| |~_|~~~~|
| -| | |
============\ # http://bibleseven.com/kd4e.html
KD4E =====================================
West Central Florida
/\ /\
?(~~~{ @ @ } Sent from
( * Puppy Linux
( ) http://www.goosee.com/puppy
~~~~~~~~~
/ / / /
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_______________________________________________
See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather
Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|