Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] (no subject)

To: "reflector -tower" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] (no subject)
From: "AA6DX" <aa6dx@pacbell.net>
Reply-to: AA6DX <aa6dx@pacbell.net>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 11:42:45 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
BUT with 2 thrust bearings, that SHOUL be minimal anyway.   Mark  AA6DX
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
To: "reflector -tower" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 11:38 AM
Subject: RE: [TowerTalk] (no subject)


> Yeah, seems a waste to me.  The only advantage would be to reduce side
> force on the rotor by increasing the length of it's side of the lever.
> 
> 
> David Robbins K1TTT
> e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net
> web: http://www.k1ttt.net
> AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-
> > bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Julio Peralta
> > Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 12:45
> > To: TOWERTALK@contesting.com
> > Subject: [TowerTalk] (no subject)
> > 
> > What is the purpose of putting a rotor 20 to 25' below the top of the
> > tower. It seems a waste of expensive mast material to me.
> > 
> > Julio, W4HY


_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>