Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [TowerTalk] (no subject)

To: "reflector -tower" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: RE: [TowerTalk] (no subject)
From: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 18:38:53 -0000
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Yeah, seems a waste to me.  The only advantage would be to reduce side
force on the rotor by increasing the length of it's side of the lever.


David Robbins K1TTT
e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net
web: http://www.k1ttt.net
AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-
> bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Julio Peralta
> Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 12:45
> To: TOWERTALK@contesting.com
> Subject: [TowerTalk] (no subject)
> 
> What is the purpose of putting a rotor 20 to 25' below the top of the
> tower. It seems a waste of expensive mast material to me.
> 
> Julio, W4HY
> _______________________________________________
> 
> See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers",
"Wireless
> Weather Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041
with
> any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>