>The MFJ-269 has a 12bit A/D converter whereas the 259B only used
>8 bits to digitize the detector voltages. From what I have heard this gives
>the 269 more accuracy at high and low values of impedance when
>compared to the 259 (the 269 over-ranges at a much higher impedance
>level than the 259).
Is the MFJ the only analyzer or is it just superior?
What other measuring devices can be used if the budget does not support the
MFJ269 plus stuff. (Close to CA$800 landed) (Or close to 3/4 gross monthly
pension)
Chris opr VE7HCB
|