The MFJ-269 has a 12bit A/D converter whereas the 259B only used
8 bits to digitize the detector voltages. From what I have heard this gives
the 269 more accuracy at high and low values of impedance when
compared to the 259 (the 269 over-ranges at a much higher impedance
level than the 259).
I got the NiMH batteries with my unit. They appear to be a lot less fussy
than NiCads.
73 de Mike, W4EF.......................................
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Shohet" <kq2m@mags.net>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2002 6:49 AM
Subject: Re: [Towertalk] Antenna Analyzer Suggestions?
> > Ultimately, though, I'm planning to buy a 259B, unless MFJ comes out
with
> > something better for my HF needs before I get done procrastinating. One
> > reason I wouldn't go the Autek route again is what appears to be a lousy
> > attitude toward customer service -- they have a very high minimum shop
> > charge for non-warranty repairs and an evident disdain for customers
> asking
> > questions.
>
> Pete, I have both a 259 and a 269. The 269 is vastly superior to the 259.
> Much easier to use, more functions, more "stable" readings, many more
> measurements. Definitely worth the extra $100!
>
> I have not owned the 259B so I can't compare that to the 269, but from
what
> I understand, there is little comparison between them too.
>
> Just my suggestion - but if you are going to be using it a lot, spend the
> extra money and get a 269.
>
> 73
>
> Bob KQ2M
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Towertalk mailing list
> Towertalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
|