What downsides??
k7puc
-----Original Message-----
From: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
To: TOWERTALK@contesting.com <TOWERTALK@contesting.com>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Tuesday, December 21, 1999 6:03 AM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] MORE 130 FT TOWER OPTIONS
>
>At 07:23 AM 12/21/1999 -0600, n4kg@juno.com wrote:
>...
>>130 ft C31XR
>>100 ft 4L15
>> 85 ft 3L20
>> 70 ft 4L15
>> 60 ft 6L10
>> 40 ft C31XR
>
>An interesting idea, but a question. Does this presuppose that the
>monoband antennas in the stack would be sections out of the C-31 (i.e.
>similar spacing)? I've always understood that stacking dissimilar antennas
>is prone to unexpected downsides unless fully modeled.
>
>73, Pete N4ZR
>
>Don't forget to update your entry in the contest station database
>http://206.102.70.3/search.htm
>
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
>Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
>Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
>Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>
>
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|