Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] MORE 130 FT TOWER OPTIONS

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] MORE 130 FT TOWER OPTIONS
From: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 09:05:02 -0500
At 07:23 AM 12/21/1999 -0600, n4kg@juno.com wrote:
...
>130 ft  C31XR
>100 ft  4L15
>  85 ft  3L20
>  70 ft  4L15
>  60 ft  6L10
>  40 ft  C31XR

An interesting idea, but a question.  Does this presuppose that the
monoband antennas in the stack would be sections out of the C-31 (i.e.
similar spacing)?  I've always understood that stacking dissimilar antennas
is prone to unexpected downsides unless fully modeled.  

73,  Pete N4ZR

Don't forget to update your entry in the contest station database
http://206.102.70.3/search.htm


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>