And, where did that photo of a BX tower come from? I went out and looked
at my HDBX-48 (with two added top straight sections the size of the top of
BX section 3) and the X-braces almost touch each other at the rivits on
the legs, and thus are not at all so far separated as the photo in CQ
Contest. Is Rohn making a lesser BX now, or for that photo? K4VUD
On Mon, 16 Jun 1997, Charles H. Harpole wrote:
> A definite error in the article on towers in the latest CQ Contest
> magazine. The article says one can not install a T2X inside the top
> section of a HDBX-48 Rohn u-channel leg tower. Wrong. I have done this
> operation--with a factory fresh non-modified tower three times.
> The rotor shelf does not have to be upside down, and no cross arms need to
> be removed. The BX is getting a little bit of a bad rap in general, and
> this error needs correction. de K4VUD
>
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
> Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
> Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
> Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|