To: | topband@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: Quarter wave sloper on crank up tower ? |
From: | Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
Reply-to: | jim@audiosystemsgroup.com |
Date: | Tue, 6 May 2025 12:23:29 -0700 |
List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
On 5/6/2025 12:11 PM, Steve Lawrence via Topband wrote: That "Lousy" counterpoise shunt feed has resulted in 225 "Current DXCC" and 39 zones on 160. 280+ on 80 and all 40 zones. Try what space allows. Of course. DXing and contesting are about what works BETTER. It has been shown that a lot of random-length, randomly arranged wires laying on the ground is better than driven rods. Their only GOOD (and necessary) use on transmitting antennas is lightning protection. 73, Jim K9YC _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Quarter wave sloper on crank up tower ?, Steve Lawrence via Topband |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Topband Digest, Vol 269, Issue 1, UA3AGW Dmitry Zaslavsky via Topband |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Quarter wave sloper on crank up tower ?, Steve Lawrence via Topband |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Quarter wave sloper on crank up tower ?, Jim Brown |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |