Got him on 80m CW last night, but he was never better than a 449.
No peep of them on 160m.
Ray,
N6VR/W7YA
Arizona
On Mon, Jan 9, 2023, 10:42 AM Ron Spencer via Topband <
topband@contesting.com> wrote:
> I agree with KQ2M, TN8K was workable last night (Sunday) on both 80 and
> 160. Here in central NC they were actually better on 160.
>
>
>
> Long periods of very Q5 copy (maybe 10dB above the noise on 160) on both
> bands followed by almost equally long periods of very light to no copy.
>
>
>
> I was monitoring ON4KST chat and Ludek, the op on 80 cw said he heard me
> several times before I actually heard him reply. So even though, as he
> noted, they are surrounded by storms, their receive beverages are working
> well.
>
>
>
> Very nice of them to listen towards the US on both bands and especially
> appreciated, on CW.
>
>
>
> Ron
>
> N4XD
>
>
> Sent using https://www.zoho.com/mail/
> _________________
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> Reflector
>
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
|