Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Square "loop" antenna for 160

To: Radio KH6O <radio.kh6o@gmail.com>, topband <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Square "loop" antenna for 160
From: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2022 11:30:34 -0800
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
On 1/31/2022 6:22 PM, Radio KH6O wrote>
I have to live with CC&R homeowner restrictions. I plan to erect a disguise
wire antenna around the perimeter of my roof; total length will be about
190 feet. Elevation will be about 20 feet above ground and will be fed with
150 ohm twin lead.*

My question is: Should this be a continuous loop or should the point
opposed the feedline be terminated with an insulator, thus giving two

Jeff KH6O
Naval Air Staiton Point Mugu, CA

Warning, long posting.  Sorry for the BW.

It just so happens that I have a horizontal square loop antenna made of #18 insulated wire, that has a perimeter (AKA length) of 200 feet, and an adjustable height of zero to 30 feet, and is in the clear, away from buildings, etc. It has a drive impedance of about 5 ohms + j600, IOW a Q of about 100, and therefore a bandwidth of a dozen or two kHz. At 30 feet, it consistently has a gain of -30 dB vs my 90 foot top loaded vertical over a massive ground screen on high conductivity ground. Except for certain stations within a few hundred miles where the loop might be "only" 20 dB down from the vertical, due to NVIS or short skip, or something. Reducing the height to 20 feet only affects the gain by a few dB.

IMPORTANT! The size of this loop is too large for it to be "magnetic" with constant current. However, I use a trick to make the current constant. Without that, the loop would be even worse.

Now to your questions:

Not closing the loop creates a bent dipole. It is approaching a half wave, but will still need loading coils. I don't know how loading coils are going to qualify as "stealth". I live on 20 acres so I don't think about stealth. I will say that I have also erected full size 160 meter dipoles at a height of 30 feet. Your bent dipole at 20 feet would be worse than this of course. My dipoles had a fairly narrow bandwidth, maybe a few dozen kHz. I don't remember for sure, but the gain was perhaps 6 dB higher than the loop, but don't quite me. Running the legal limit power, you will be lucky to get a watt or two EIRP. The digital modes like FT8 will be your only viable option.

If you don't have an amplifier, you need to get a cheap used tube type one. They don't command much money these days.

Puh-leeze! don't feed it with twin lead. You need a remote matching network at the feed point. Hopefully with some frequency switching so you can cover more than a sliver of the band. The question about stealth is again raised.

BTW, I only use my loop for receiving. I worked a JA while using it for receive when it was lowered to 10 feet. It generally receives as well as the vertical in terms of signal to noise ratio, with the loop at its usual 30 foot height.

73
Rick N6RK


_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>