Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: (2wire) Beverage transformers

To: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: (2wire) Beverage transformers
From: Lee STRAHAN <k7tjr@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2021 20:21:36 +0000
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Hi Mike,
   Assuming that you did not miss that this was a tapped winding and not 
separate windings as Csaba mentioned. I see on reflection that he measured 
1:1.16 on one of his tests. In reality it wont likely get much better than 
that. That test was likely the 3:12 he mentioned using. The high impedance side 
of these transformers are a little unpredictable using simple formulas with 
winding capacitance and magnetizing inductance added in the mix.
  Sometimes I use wire wrap wire if it is not going to be used outside 
otherwise I use #27 high temp motor winding class insulation wire which helps 
keep from shorting the wires to the core. I have the benefit of many part 
spools of motor winding wire scraps from a best friend and Ham in the Motor 
rewinding business. By the way, Norton amplifiers require 1:11:4 which is the 
same problem to solve as they are separate windings in the ones I use. I also 
fit shrink tubing in the Norton amp cores for insulation first. I don’t use 
Teflon because it has a dielectric constant around 5 which increases the 
capacitance from the wire to the core. Its tedious but can be done easily. And 
in the case of the Norton amp it leaves room for a larger wire on the 1 turn 
winding. Yes 4 AND16 for 20 total can be done but yes it takes time and lots of 
patience. For those turns counts I go to # 75 material toroid cores which have 
slightly more winding room but require more turns usually for 160 meter stuff.  
All this probably more than you wanted to know. HNY
Lee  K7TJR  OR

From: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 2, 2021 11:44 AM
To: Lee K7TJR <k7tjr@msn.com>
Cc: HA3LN <list@ha3ln.hu>; topband <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: (2wire) Beverage transformers

Lee,

What kind of wire do you use that allows that many turns (4t and 16t)?

73 Mike
W0BTU

On Sat, Jan 2, 2021, 1:37 PM Lee STRAHAN <k7tjr@msn.com<mailto:k7tjr@msn.com>> 
wrote:
Hello Csaba,
   I approach this problem this way your impedance ratio is 745/50 ohms or 14.9 
. To get turns ratio use the square root of that which is 3.86 . So round that 
up to 4 as a good turns ratio.
  On a BN73-202 core I usually use a minimum of 4 turns on the 50 ohm side for 
160 meters, so the secondary would need 4 turns ratio times that for 16 turns. 
Therefore 16 turns tapped at 4 turns should work for you. Some will say the 3 
turns on the 50 ohm side should work and the secondary then would be turns 
ratio 4 times that or 12 turns. Therefore 12 turns tapped at 3 turns should 
work well also. Sorry, I do not follow your formula as shown but you can use 
the above and it will work fine as an 800 ohm load to the 745 ohm source. This 
will reflect 745/16 or 46.6 ohms to your cable. SWR for that at the 50 ohm 
cable  is 50/46.6 or 1.07 using resistance only for evaluation.
Lee   K7TJR  OR

-----Original Message-----
From: Topband 
<topband-bounces+k7tjr=msn.com@contesting.com<mailto:msn.com@contesting.com>> 
On Behalf Of HA3LN
Sent: Saturday, January 2, 2021 4:59 AM
To: topband@contesting.com<mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Topband: (2wire) Beverage transformers

Hi All and HNY for 2021.

Preparing for the CQ160m with new (2 coax) 2-wire beverages to cover the 
missing azimuthal gaps based on LBDX. The first 2x Bevs worked great back in 
last Jan.

Now I have difficulties with reaching good imped match with the
T2 transformer (responsible to transform the 745 Ohms wire impedance to 50 Ohm 
coax). I use n1=3T/n2=12T tapped @6T transformer (2m high, 20cm wide with 0.8mm 
wire)

What can be the reason for the impedance transformation is rather off to the 
calculated value?

This is the T2 transformer from 2019:
http://ha3ln.hu/VNA_190116_230811.jpg
...and this from yesterday:
http://ha3ln.hu/VNA_210101_153241.jpg

I have
- same wire with the diam (even from the same roll)
- same BN73-202 cores (tried to use several cores from different
   sources to eliminate the possible mix inconsistencies)
- same winding method (including n2 tapping)
- created a low inductance test resistor network for 744 Ohms

...tried to wind
- lousy, and precise (crossing windings vs. side-by-side, bunched
   wires, etc.)
- n1 first and n2, after n2 first and n1, of course no difference.
- without the tapping, same as above.
- difference turning ratios (3/12, 2/12, 1/12, 3/11, etc.) to see
   the change


The best I could reach now on 160m is
- SWR: 1:1.29 (Rs=40.4 Ohms, Xs=-5.4 Ohms) vs. in 2019:
- SWR: 1:1.16 (Rs=43.2 Ohms, Xs=-1.6 Ohms)

I know, Beverages are really die hard antennas and this increased mismatch 
might have zero effect on performance but still, the engineer part of me...

_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>